Tort - Medical negligence - Damages - State sponsored family planning programme - Unsuccessful sterilisation operation - Birth of 'unwanted child' attributable to negligence of doctor - Woman, sterilised, a poor labourer already having seven children - Held, entitled to claim full damages from State Govt. as well as doctor for bringing up child up to age of puberty - Statutory liability of parents to maintain child under Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act and Mohammeddan Law is no bar in claiming damages on account of tort. Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act (78 of 1956) , S.20, S.23— Criminal P.C. (2 of 1974) , S.125— In a country where the population is increasing by the tick of every second on the clock and the Government had taken up the family planning as an important programme for the implementation of which it had created mass awakening for the use of various devices including sterilisation operation, the doctor as also the State must be held responsible in damages if the sterilisation operation performed by him is a failure on account of his negligence, which is directly responsible for another birth in the family, creating additional economic burden on the person who had chosen to be operated upon for sterilisation. 'Negligence' is a 'tort'. Every Doctor who enters into the medical profession has a duty to act with a reasonable degree of care and ....