(A) Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act (55 of 1981) S. 3 — Preventive detention — Application of mind — Detaining authority was not made aware of judgment passed by Court acquitting detenu — Resulting in non-application of mind by detaining authority to said fact — Vitiating requisite subjective satisfaction — Thus rendered detention order invalid
(B) Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act (55 of 1981) S. 3 — Preventive detention — Subjective satisfaction — In-camera statements of witnesses — Detaining authority relying upon report submitted by Assistant Commissioner of Police — Detaining authority himself not verifying truthfulness of incidents stated by witnesses in their in-camera statements — Detaining authority also considering extraneous material — Vitiating subjective satisfaction of detaining authority — Detention vitiated thereby (Paras 11, 13)