(A) Penal Code (45 of 1860) , S.300, S.203— Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Evidence relating to disclosure statements and recovery of ornaments of deceased - Discrepant and contradictory - Suffering from glaring infirmities and improbabilities - Evidence of convenient witnesses and investigation officer, untrustworthy - Nail clippings of deceased and hair recovered from dead body not connecting accused with crime - Cryptic FIR - Acquittal of accused was proper. 1985 Cri LJ NOC 117 (Delhi), Reversed. Evidence Act (1 of 1872) , S.3— (Para 26 30 34) (B) Evidence Act (1 of 1872) , S.3, S.9— Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Identification of accused - Alleged murder of wife - Pointing towards husband by dogs of police dog squad - Not a circumstance compatible only with hypothesis of guilt of accused husband. Penal Code (45 of 1860) , S.300— Murder - Death of wife - Dogs of police dog squad pointing towards husband - Not sufficient to connect him with crime. In the case of alleged murder of wife the accused husband had slept in the verandah near the cot where the dead body of his wife was found; and he had locked the collapsible door with the recovered lock before going to slee....