(A) Constitution of India , Art.141— Precedent - Reliance on decision - Cannot be placed without discussing whether it was rendered in same factual and legal background - Judgments of Court - Cannot be construed as statutes - Since judges interpret words of statutes. Interpretation of Statutes - Words in judgment - Cannot be interpreted as statutes. Civil P.C. (5 of 1908) , S.2(9)— Courts should not place reliance on decisions without discussing as to how the factual situation fits in with the fact situation of the decision on which reliance is placed. Observations of Courts are not to be read as Euclid's theorems nor as provisions of the statute. These observations must be read in the context in which they appear. Judgments of Courts are not to be construed as statutes. To interpret words, phrases and provisions of a statute, it may become necessary for Judges to embark into lengthy discussions, but the discussion is meant to explain and not to define. Judges interpret statutes, they do not interpret judgments. They interpret words of statutes; their words are not to be interpreted as statutes. Circumstantial flexibility, one additional or different fact may make a world of difference between conclusions in two cases. Disposal @page-SC2662 of cases by blindly placing reliance on a decision is not proper.(Para 11 ....