(A) Civil P.C. (5 of 1908) , O.10 R.2, O.12 R.3A, O.18 R.14— Examination of party under - Is to ascertain matter in controversy in suit - Not to record evidence or secure admission or cross-examine party - Court confronting party with only signature part of disputed, unexhibited document by covering other portion - Amounts to cross-examination - Process adopted in examination under O.10, R.2 is impermissible. Evidence Act (1 of 1872) , S.165— The object of oral examination under R. 2 of O. 10 is to ascertain the matter in controversy in suit, and not to record evidence or to secure admissions. The statement made by a party in an examination under R. 2 is not under oath, and is not intended to be a substitute for a regular examination under oath under O. 18. It is intended to elucidate what is obscure and vague in the pleadings. In other words, the purpose of the oral examination under R. 2 is mainly to elucidate the allegations even in his own pleadings, or any documents filed with the pleadings. The power under O. 10, R. 2 of the Code, cannot be converted into a process of selective cross-examination by the Court, before the party has an opportunity to put forth his case at the trial.(Para 11) The power of Court to call upon a party to admit any document and record whether the party admits or refuses or neglects....